[pulseaudio-discuss] Licensing issue
Todd.Turner at windriver.com
Fri Mar 28 07:09:28 PDT 2008
The GPL'd code is in a separate library (libatomic_ops_gpl).
From: pulseaudio-discuss-bounces at mail.0pointer.de
[mailto:pulseaudio-discuss-bounces at mail.0pointer.de] On Behalf Of DSK
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:20 AM
To: pulseaudio-discuss at mail.0pointer.de
Subject: [pulseaudio-discuss] Licensing issue
I see that the daemon side has a GPL License and the client side
library has LGPL, but libatomic_ops is GPL.
So wont the libatomic_ops licensing affect the client side library
licensing as i understand that its linked to client side library as well
Or is that my understanding of libatomic_ops getting linked to client
side library (i.e. libpulse) wrong?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss