[pulseaudio-discuss] System mode and pactl
Lennart Poettering
lennart at poettering.net
Fri Oct 31 12:18:21 PDT 2008
On Fri, 31.10.08 19:53, Rafał Mużyło (galtgendo at o2.pl) wrote:
> You're right, I've mixed up those two.
> The annoying part is it doesn't seems to work even for root.
--system is not the same as running as root. --system runs PA as pulse:pulse.
> What about the options ?
> I was trying to set tsched_buffer_watermark=48 in system.pa,
> but load-module for the sink didn't work even when I tried it
> without any options.
"Didn't work"? How so?
48 is a pretty small wtermark.
>
> BTW, I'm often getting:
> [pulseaudio] alsa-util.c: snd_pcm_avail_update() returned a valu
> e that is exceptionally large: 229216 bytes (1193 ms) Most likely this
> is an ALSA driver bug. Please report this issue to the PulseAudio
> developers.
That means that there is probably some issue with your ALSA driver or
your scheduler.
The function snd_pcm_avail_update() tells us how many samples are
ready for reading resp. writing. In your case at one time this value is
exceptionally large, i.e. > 3 times the size of the hardware
buffer. Which means that PA slept for much longer than it should or
there is something seriously wrong with the timing information your
driver returns.
PA uses the timing information the ALSA driver exports to estimate
when it needs to wake up. In your case this calculation went wrong,
presumably because the ALSA data was bogus -- or the wakeup time was
calculated correctly but but due to some other reasons PA didn't get
woken up in that time, possibly because some other app put some high
load on the CPU or the scheduler went nuts. Or things got calculated
correctly but then the data when we check the results is invalid.
There should be discontinuities in sound when this happens. Are there?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list