[pulseaudio-discuss] Desperation with idling

[Lennart Poettering]

On Wed, 21.10.09 13:43, Alvaro Alonso Jiménez (alvaroalo at gmail.com) wrote:

> You mean that when having silence, since there is no change, there is no
> necessity to be updating the content of the output stream, don't
> you??? 

No?

All I am saying is that we dynamically scale the wakeup intervals (and
hence block sizes) based on the demands of the clients. 

> And if so, is there any way of modifying this?? I have been looking
> into the source code, but I am not able to locate where to configure
> this block size so it will not make difference between the cases of
> having silence and having sound.

http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/LatencyControl

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4