[pulseaudio-discuss] is there any special reason libpulse and libpulsecommon are separate libraries?

[Lennart Poettering]

On Thu, 14.01.10 02:50, paul ヽ (ephraim_owns at hotmail.com) wrote:

> i ask because the circular dependancy they have on each other
> prevents libpulse being built with -no-undefined, which means that
> you could never compile pulse audio on windows afaik

Yes. libpulse is API stable while libpulsecommon is not.

For a longer explanation please read this:

http://www.mail-archive.com/pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de/msg02333.html

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4