[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] volume: Fix incorrect usage of PA_VOLUME_IS_VALID

David Henningsson david.henningsson at canonical.com
Tue Oct 19 13:02:53 PDT 2010

On 2010-10-19 15:43, pl bossart wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Colin Guthrie<gmane at colin.guthr.ie>  wrote:
>> 'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 19/10/10 08:33 did gyre and gimble:
>>> The commit that introduced this macro was incorrect in some places. This
>>> patch fixes these. Thanks to Pierre-Louis Bossart for pointing this out.
>> I thought I'd looked over all the cases where this was used to spot
>> these as I was mindful that this could have been a problem easily
>> introduced with this kind of change, but clearly I didn't do a good job.
>> So much for that :s
>> I've pushed this patch now as it's very obvious from looking at the
>> changes that it's needed.
>> Would be good if it did solve all of Pierre's issues too.
> This patch corrects the issue I reported. Thanks Arun.
> However I am now having problems with my multichannel files even when
> the same volume is applied for all tracks.... constant high frequency
> noise...more git bisect ahead of me...

It would also be good to know is PULSE_NO_SIMD=1 affects the HF noise, 
and if switching to stable-queue affects the HF noise?

David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.

More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list