[pulseaudio-discuss] State of various rate adjustment patches
david.henningsson at canonical.com
Wed Feb 9 08:52:15 PST 2011
On 2011-02-09 17:07, Maarten Bosmans wrote:
> As I said before, the last commit
> [72b90ea8ac53e23862284991a2ce355de250f585] is really beyond my
> understanding of rewinds and would definately not be appropriate for
> stable-queue without further review. Also, it has not been tested in
> combination with David's rewind patches, so that needs to be done too.
From what I can tell, the change seems to be copy-pasted from
protocol-native.c, and so it's probably correct. My rewind patches
shouldn't change that either for better or for worse. That said, of
course testing wouldn't hurt :-)
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss