[pulseaudio-discuss] RFC: Routing and Priority lists
tanu.kaskinen at digia.com
Wed Nov 23 12:30:51 PST 2011
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 21:52 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> I think you could still have separate ports for each accessory type. It
> would make it simpler to set up accessory specific tuning parameters,
> for example, if the only thing that mattered was the port in use,
> instead of the port and some property.
I meant to say also that from the UI point of view it shouldn't be any
more complex: it can just mark the appropriate port as available (so it
works as a jack detection mechanism of sorts).
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss