[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Update LICENSE
mkbosmans at gmail.com
Sun Nov 27 08:03:18 PST 2011
2011/11/27 Colin Guthrie <gmane at colin.guthr.ie>:
> 'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 22/11/11 15:08 did gyre and gimble:
>> Mention gdbm, lirc and fftw there.
> Cool. In a way we should possibly be deliberately vague here so that
> people who are concerned about this will investigate properly (I think
> this was a deliberate thought process during our last discussion on this
> topic), but I'm certainly not going to block more detail here.
> My only concern is that if we don't mention any future libs compiled in,
> that we may be called to task on it whereas if we were vague from the
> outset then we cannot be blamed! But this is mostly a paranoid "it might
> never happen" type concern, so... pushed.
You're right in that we shouldn't give any guarantees. But I think
it's very well possible to both be as complete as possible (I _think_
that my review caught all GPL dependencies) and at the same time put
the final burden on the concerned user. The last paragraph of LICENSE
makes this perfectly clear.
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss