[pulseaudio-discuss] Why are we checking various sample rates?
superquad.vortex2 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 1 04:57:53 PST 2012
2012-11-30 下午5:01 於 "David Henningsson" <david.henningsson at canonical.com>
> I'm researching a bug where some set of USB speakers stopped working,
probably in 2.x. The peculiar thing about this sound card is that seems to
only work at a sample rate of 46875 Hz.
> So in 2.x, the probe fails with
> "E: [pulseaudio] alsa-sink.c: Failed to find any supported sample
rates.", whereas in an earlier version, it would just happily work at 46875
Hz instead, as I understand it.
> So my first question is; why do we check all these rates, when we end up
just alternating between default-sample-rate (44100 Hz) and
alternate-sample-rate (48000 Hz) anyway?
> And second, can we try not to fail if we can't find any supported sample
rates, so we can fix this regression?
Since pulseaudio 2.0 require sound card support sample rate which are
multiple of 4000 and 11025
> For reference, this is the bug (with pulse verbose logs in it):
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss