[pulseaudio-discuss] Module unloading in reverse order?

[David Henningsson]

I've noticed that modules unload in the same order that they are 
created: i e, if module A loads first, and then module B, then module A 
is also unloaded before module B when pulseaudio is shutting down.

It feels more logical to me to have it the other way around, like a 
"module stack", so if module A is loaded first, it should be unloaded last.

Now, if you agree with me, dare we switch this around? It would at least 
lead to that there is no module-null-sink loaded at shutdown ( \o/ ), 
and maybe unloading module-dbus-protocol before module-udev-detect would 
also reduce the risk of SIGSEGVs discovered yesterday.

But there might be things I'm not seeing, so what do you think?

-- 
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
http://launchpad.net/~diwic