[pulseaudio-discuss] express my interests in applying GSoC 2012
David Henningsson
david.henningsson at canonical.com
Wed Mar 21 00:21:41 PDT 2012
On 03/20/2012 03:48 PM, rong deng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is Deng Zhenrong from Shanghai China, I've already used Linux as my
> main desktop for several years. Now I would like to express my interests
> in applying pulseaudio's projects for this year's GSoC in this mail.
Hi Deng and welcome to PulseAudio! :-)
More contributors are always welcome. As for GSoC, I have never mentored
anyone and won't be able to do so this summer either, so I'll let
somebody else answer to that.
> Glancing through the ideas, I find I'm interested in several few
> already. :) But I'd like to focus on one thing which is test/log
> facilities for now. I'm still doing my homework on this topic and I'll
> come up with more detailed info in later days.
>
> So to get my hands dirty, I've already downloaded pulseaudio source code
> and compile it and set it up. Now I find there's a compilation warning,
> and here's my patch to fix it, cool :)
>
> I'm attaching the patch generated from git format-patch, I'm not sure
> whether it's OK, as I see it from the mailing list, other developers
> send patches directly in mails. This patch is my first one to get
> familiar with the workflow, if there's anything wrong, please tell me. :)
As for the patch, I believe you did most things right. :-) Some people
prefer you send the patch using "git send-email", but for me, it does
not matter much.
As for using the PRI-prefixes, it seems we do not use this anywhere else
in the code. Therefore I have two questions:
1) Do you think there is a risk that some compiler that we want to build
PulseAudio under, does not support these prefixes (remember, this is not
only used in Linux, but in Windows, Mac OS, OS/2 IIRC and others)?
2) Would "%llx" solve this warning equally well?
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
http://launchpad.net/~diwic
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list