[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] reserve-monitor: Don't trigger on our own events

Tanu Kaskinen tanuk at iki.fi
Sat Jan 12 08:49:08 PST 2013

On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 17:36 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 04:46 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > Good point. So, there are two bugs: m->busy isn't initialized properly,
> > and change_cb() is sometimes called even when m->busy doesn't change.
> Well, I figured that it would be - maybe mostly theoretical here, but 
> still - the case that given three apps A, B, and C with descending 
> priorities, that B want to know of a change from A to C so that it could 
> grab the sound card now that a lower priority app has it.

C can't get the device from A, since C has lower priority.

> > How to proceed? If I was to decide, we'd take my patch for fixing the
> > redundant change_cb() calls, and adapt your patch to fix the
> > initialization (is_really_busy() should be called in rm_watch(), instead
> > of using it in filter_handler() to work around the initialization bug).
> > If that sounds good, do you wish to send an updated patch, or do you
> > prefer me to do it?
> I don't have time/priority to fix the initialization (I believe it 
> requires a call to org.freedesktop's GetNameOwner function?), so if you 
> do the initialization within a few days time I'm okay with that. 
> Otherwise I suggest we push my patch as it is.

I'll write the patch today. Regarding pushing, I didn't push my patch,
because I thought that we should get updates from upstream reserve.git.
I hope Lennart will push these patches soon.


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list