tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com
Thu Nov 28 08:09:54 PST 2013
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 16:58 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 02:47 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > Upstream pulseaudio isn't in the business of showing dialogs.
> Ehm, given the fact that we even had a GSoC project (which was never
> merged) which was *all* about showing dialogs, I think you want to
> reconsider this statement.
OK, I'll soften the statement to "in my opinion PulseAudio shouldn't be
in the business of showing dialogs". I don't remember if I criticized
the GSoC project idea at all at the time it was discussed. Perhaps my
thinking has changed since then. Currently I do wish that the problem of
popping up notifications would be handled outside PulseAudio, so I'm
certainly not a fan of the notification framework thing.
> Also, I don't remember you stating anything in this direction when we
> discussed this in Edinburgh. I thought we had an agreement that it was
> OK for PulseAudio to control the dialog?
I remember advocating an approach where PulseAudio would not control the
dialog, and if I recall correctly, Colin suggesting using the
notification framework from GSoC. It's possible that we agreed
something, but unfortunately I don't remember that.
As I said earlier, I don't want to block the work on this issue. I'm
just expressing my personal opinion about how the responsibilities
between PulseAudio and the UI should be divided.
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss