[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCHv2 60/60] bluetooth: Revive module-bluetooth-discover
João Paulo Rechi Vita
jprvita at gmail.com
Tue Sep 17 13:41:10 PDT 2013
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Tanu Kaskinen
<tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 19:19 -0300, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Tanu Kaskinen
>> <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 01:54 -0300, jprvita at gmail.com wrote:
>> >> From: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita at openbossa.org>
>> >>
>> >> Create a wrapper module called module-bluetooth-discover to avoid
>> >> breaking backward-compatibility of default.pa. This wrapper may
>> >> eventually be dropped altoghether with BlueZ 4 support.
>> >> ---
>> >> src/Makefile.am | 8 ++
>> >> src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-discover.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
>> >> create mode 100644 src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-discover.c
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am
>> >> index 0973d31..a283220 100644
>> >> --- a/src/Makefile.am
>> >> +++ b/src/Makefile.am
>> >> @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ endif
>> >>
>> >> if HAVE_BLUEZ
>> >> modlibexec_LTLIBRARIES += \
>> >> + module-bluetooth-discover.la \
>> >> module-bluetooth-policy.la
>> >> endif
>> >>
>> >> @@ -1427,6 +1428,7 @@ SYMDEF_FILES = \
>> >> module-systemd-login-symdef.h \
>> >> module-bluetooth-proximity-symdef.h \
>> >> module-bluetooth-policy-symdef.h \
>> >> + module-bluetooth-discover-symdef.h \
>> >> module-bluez4-discover-symdef.h \
>> >> module-bluez4-device-symdef.h \
>> >> module-bluez5-discover-symdef.h \
>> >> @@ -2035,6 +2037,12 @@ module_bluetooth_policy_la_LDFLAGS = $(MODULE_LDFLAGS)
>> >> module_bluetooth_policy_la_LIBADD = $(MODULE_LIBADD)
>> >> module_bluetooth_policy_la_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS) $(DBUS_CFLAGS)
>> >>
>> >> +# Bluetooth discover
>> >> +module_bluetooth_discover_la_SOURCES = modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-discover.c
>> >> +module_bluetooth_discover_la_LDFLAGS = $(MODULE_LDFLAGS)
>> >> +module_bluetooth_discover_la_LIBADD = $(MODULE_LIBADD)
>> >> +module_bluetooth_discover_la_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS)
>> >> +
>> >> # Bluetooth BlueZ 4 sink / source
>> >> module_bluez4_discover_la_SOURCES = modules/bluetooth/module-bluez4-discover.c
>> >> module_bluez4_discover_la_LDFLAGS = $(MODULE_LDFLAGS)
>> >> diff --git a/src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-discover.c b/src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-discover.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..ffedca2
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/src/modules/bluetooth/module-bluetooth-discover.c
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
>> >> +/***
>> >> + This file is part of PulseAudio.
>> >> +
>> >> + Copyright 2013 João Paulo Rechi Vita
>> >> +
>> >> + PulseAudio is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> >> + it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as
>> >> + published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the
>> >> + License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> >> +
>> >> + PulseAudio is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
>> >> + WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> >> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
>> >> + General Public License for more details.
>> >> +
>> >> + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
>> >> + License along with PulseAudio; if not, write to the Free Software
>> >> + Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307
>> >> + USA.
>> >> +***/
>> >> +
>> >> +#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
>> >> +#include <config.h>
>> >> +#endif
>> >> +
>> >> +#include <pulsecore/core-util.h>
>> >> +#include <pulsecore/macro.h>
>> >> +#include <pulsecore/module.h>
>> >> +
>> >> +#include "module-bluetooth-discover-symdef.h"
>> >> +
>> >> +PA_MODULE_AUTHOR("João Paulo Rechi Vita");
>> >> +PA_MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Detect available Bluetooth daemon and load the corresponding discovery module");
>> >> +PA_MODULE_VERSION(PACKAGE_VERSION);
>> >> +PA_MODULE_LOAD_ONCE(true);
>> >> +
>> >> +struct userdata {
>> >> + pa_module *bluez5_module;
>> >> + pa_module *bluez4_module;
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +/* This function is heavily inspired in the implementation of ".ifexists" */
>> >
>> > Would it be possible to share the implementation between
>> > module-bluetooth-discover and the ".ifexists" handler? We could have a
>> > function called pa_module_exists(), for example.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, I've thought about sharing code here but in cli-command.h, which
>> would be a bit weird. Having it in module.h makes much more sense. I
>> have created pa_module_exists() which can handle module names (i.e.:
>> module-bluetooth-discover), relative file names (i.e.:
>> module-bluetooth-discover.so), and absolute file names (i.e.:
>> /tmp/module-bluetooth-discover.so). I may have missed some corner
>> cases, so it would be a good idea if you can double check it.
>>
>> >> +static bool exists(const char *filename) {
>> >> + const char *paths, *state = NULL;
>> >> + char *p, *pathname;
>> >> + bool result;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (!(paths = lt_dlgetsearchpath()))
>> >
>> > undefined reference to `lt_dlgetsearchpath'
>> >
>> > Does this compile on your machine?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, it does. I don't have this problem here.
>>
>> >> + return false;
>> >> +
>> >> + while ((p = pa_split(paths, ":", &state))) {
>> >> + pathname = pa_sprintf_malloc("%s" PA_PATH_SEP "%s", p, filename);
>> >> + result = access(pathname, F_OK) == 0 ? true : false;
>> >> + pa_log_debug("Checking for existence of '%s': %s", pathname, result ? "success" : "failure");
>> >> + pa_xfree(pathname);
>> >> + pa_xfree(p);
>> >> + if (result)
>> >> + return true;
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> + state = NULL;
>> >> + if (PA_UNLIKELY(pa_run_from_build_tree())) {
>> >> + while ((p = pa_split(paths, ":", &state))) {
>> >> + pathname = pa_sprintf_malloc("%s" PA_PATH_SEP ".libs" PA_PATH_SEP "%s", p, filename);
>> >> + result = access(pathname, F_OK) == 0 ? true : false;
>> >> + pa_log_debug("Checking for existence of '%s': %s", pathname, result ? "success" : "failure");
>> >> + pa_xfree(pathname);
>> >> + pa_xfree(p);
>> >> + if (result)
>> >> + return true;
>> >> + }
>> >> + }
>> >> + return false;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +int pa__init(pa_module* m) {
>> >> + struct userdata *u;
>> >> +
>> >> + pa_assert(m);
>> >> +
>> >> + m->userdata = u = pa_xnew0(struct userdata, 1);
>> >> +
>> >> + if (exists("module-bluez5-discover.so"))
>> >> + u->bluez5_module = pa_module_load(m->core, "module-bluez5-discover", NULL);
>> >> +
>> >> + if (exists("module-bluez4-discover.so"))
>> >> + u->bluez4_module = pa_module_load(m->core, "module-bluez4-discover", NULL);
>> >> +
>> >> + return 0;
>> >
>> > I think loading module-bluetooth-discover should fail if neither of the
>> > modules exist or load successfully.
>> >
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> > Also, keeping module-bluetooth-discover running doesn't seem useful, so
>> > once the module has successfully loaded, it should immediately call
>> > pa_module_unload_request() on itself.
>> >
>>
>> I've made the changes according to your comment, but afterwards I
>> started thinking if it wouldn't be a good idea to keep
>> module-bluetooth-discovery around so the user can unload the bluetooth
>> modules without having to know if the system have BlueZ 4 or BlueZ 5.
>> What do you think?
>
> I'm OK with either alternative. If you keep module-bluetooth-discover
> loaded, I think you should pass "true" as the force parameter to
> pa_module_unload(). This doesn't have a big practical effect, but
> generally the force parameter should be "false" only in code that
> implements some kind of a client interface (native protocol, D-Bus
> protocol).
>
Ok.
--
João Paulo Rechi Vita
http://about.me/jprvita
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list