[pulseaudio-discuss] Less CPU overhead with a new protocol channel mechanism
Peter Meerwald
pmeerw at pmeerw.net
Fri Apr 4 02:54:35 PDT 2014
Hello,
> In low latency scenarios, PulseAudio uses up quite a bit of CPU. A while
> ago I did some profiling and noticed that much of the time was spent
> inside the ppoll syscall.
this is indeed a relevant problem; PA easily uses 20%+ CPU on
embedded ARM systems in low-latency duplex workloads according to my
measurements
> 1) Woohoo, this is great! Just make your patches upstreamable and I
> promise I'll review them right away!
>
> 2) Woohoo, this is great! But I don't have any time to review them, so
> just finish your patches up, and push them without review!
I'm somewhere in between 1 and 2; I'd like to reproduce your
measurements on ARM
p.
--
Peter Meerwald
+43-664-2444418 (mobile)
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list