[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 00/12] A new ringbuffer based protocol for PulseAudio
david.henningsson at canonical.com
Mon Jun 23 23:56:38 PDT 2014
On 2014-06-17 16:10, Peter Meerwald wrote:
> Hello David,
>>>> Third iteration.
>>> paplay --latency-msec XXX audio_s16_2ch_44k1.wav
>>> on beagleboard-xm @ 1 GHz, kernel 3.15
> I want to re-benchmark with SHM off, at first sight it appears that load
> is LOWER (for low-latency)?!
Iochannel + no SHM could very well be faster than iochannel + SHM,
because SHM means some extra code.
I would be surprised if iochannel + no SHM was significantly faster than
srbchannel + SHM, because eventfds are supposed to be faster than pipes .
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
 http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/eventfd.2.html - "The kernel
overhead of an eventfd file descriptor is much lower than that of a pipe".
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss