[pulseaudio-discuss] RFC: New volume functionality for PulseAudio

David Henningsson david.henningsson at canonical.com
Tue Jun 24 04:19:22 PDT 2014

On 2014-06-24 11:34, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> David suggested merging the volume and mute control implementations at
> least in the server code. I didn't first quite understand what that
> would mean in practice, but now that I've worked on the code for a
> while, I see that David was right. A lot of duplication can be avoided
> if volume and mute controls share some of the implementation in one way
> or another. I'm not sure if this should be reflected also in the client
> API.

I think it should, or all clients will have to duplicate their code...

I remember thinking that pa_ext_volume_api_bvolume should include a "int 
mute" field. Then every mute specific stuff, including mute controls, 
can be skipped.

David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.

More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list