[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 6/8] launch: Add systemd units for launching pulseaudio user instances
Colin Guthrie
gmane at colin.guthr.ie
Mon Nov 10 08:13:20 PST 2014
Tanu Kaskinen wrote on 10/11/14 15:49:
> Hi Colin,
>
> While I was adding systemd .service and .socket files for the system
> mode in Tizen, I noticed something in configure.ac that I didn't pay
> attention to before...
>
> On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 09:42 +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> ---
>> configure.ac | 11 +++++++++++
>> src/Makefile.am | 12 +++++++++++-
>> src/daemon/systemd/user/pulseaudio.service.in | 10 ++++++++++
>> src/daemon/systemd/user/pulseaudio.socket | 10 ++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 src/daemon/systemd/user/pulseaudio.service.in
>> create mode 100644 src/daemon/systemd/user/pulseaudio.socket
>>
>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>> index 25cb207..23905ad 100644
>> --- a/configure.ac
>> +++ b/configure.ac
>> @@ -1203,6 +1203,13 @@ AS_IF([test "x$HAVE_SYSTEMD" = "x1"],
>> HAVE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL=1
>> ])
>>
>> +AC_ARG_WITH([systemduserunitdir],
>> + AS_HELP_STRING([--with-systemduserunitdir=DIR], [Directory for systemd user service files]),
>> + [], [with_systemduserunitdir=$($PKG_CONFIG --variable=systemduserunitdir systemd)])
>> +if test "x$with_systemduserunitdir" != xno; then
>> + AC_SUBST([systemduserunitdir], [$with_systemduserunitdir])
>> +fi
>
> Is it really a good idea to use pkg-config to get the unit directory?
> pkg-config will probably return /usr/lib/systemd/system, while we should
> by default install under /usr/local to avoid overwriting distro files.
It'll usually say /usr/lib/systemd/user (not system) but yes, this is
pretty much the same as the udevrules dir.
Installing into /usr/local/ would be pretty weird tho' as they just
wouldn't work there (which would be especially odd if you didn't have a
system-installed version of PA). This is the same logic with the
udevrulesdir I guess.
So I'd say that using pkgconfig to get the value is just as sensible as
the hard-coded /lib/udev/rules.d/ stuff that's in there currently.
> Also, why do you treat "--with-systemduserunitdir=no" as a special case?
> Why would anyone want to leave systemduserunitdir unspecified?
That's likely an oversight, copied/pasted from alsa-utils... I suspect
we can't really handle the "no" case and we require this to be a real
value - the ability to override it is useful for test installs of course
(in the same way that I override the udevrulesdir), but I agree that I
should tweak the "no" case bit.
Col
--
Colin Guthrie
gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie
http://colin.guthr.ie/
Day Job:
Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
Open Source:
Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list