[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 00/13] cpu-test rework patches

David Henningsson david.henningsson at canonical.com
Mon Sep 8 07:08:22 PDT 2014



On 2014-04-24 18:50, Peter Meerwald wrote:
> From: Peter Meerwald <p.meerwald at bct-electronic.com>
>
> patch 1 add a flag to force execution of generic (slow) code to the
> cpu_info struct; this makes it possible to test the special case code
> versus the generic code
>
> patch 2 splits up the cpu-test program into cpu-remap-test, cpu-sconv-test,
> cpu-mix-test and cpu-volume-test (no functional change)
>
> patches 3 to 4 are cleanup
>
> patch 5 adds test cases for special-case mixing code (made possible by patch 1 and
> obsoleting the mix-special-test program which will be dropped in patch 13)
>
> patch 6 adds test cases for ARM NEON mixing code to cpu-mix-test
>
> patches 7 and 8 reorganize cpu-remap-test to avoid code duplication
>
> patches 9 and 10 add test cases for special remapping and rearranging code path
> to cpu-remap-test
>
> patch 11 adds test cases for ARM NEON remapping and rearranging code to
> cpu-remap-test
>
> patch 12 is cleanup
>
> patch 13 drops the mix-special-test program

The patches I did not write anything about, I looked them through 
quickly and nothing stood out as wrong or broken. I didn't do any 
in-depth review of them, but if nobody else wants to review them, I 
think they are okay to push as is. I presume you have tested your test 
code :-)

-- 
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list