[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2] bluetooth: Only create backend instance once objects are listed
Tanu Kaskinen
tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com
Wed Sep 10 03:22:57 PDT 2014
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 13:02 +0300, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> Hi Tanu,
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> <luiz.dentz at gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz at intel.com>
> >
> > This makes sure the devices are discovered before the backend start
> > creating new transports.
> > ---
> > src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c b/src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c
> > index efe87d3..97862d5 100644
> > --- a/src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c
> > +++ b/src/modules/bluetooth/bluez5-util.c
> > @@ -895,6 +895,9 @@ static void get_managed_objects_reply(DBusPendingCall *pending, void *userdata)
> >
> > y->objects_listed = true;
> >
> > + if (!y->backend)
> > + y->backend = pa_bluetooth_backend_new(y->core);
> > +
> > finish:
> > dbus_message_unref(r);
> >
> > @@ -947,6 +950,10 @@ static DBusHandlerResult filter_cb(DBusConnection *bus, DBusMessage *m, void *us
> > pa_hashmap_remove_all(y->devices);
> > pa_hashmap_remove_all(y->adapters);
> > y->objects_listed = false;
> > + if (y->backend) {
> > + pa_bluetooth_backend_free(y->backend);
> > + y->backend = NULL;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > if (new_owner && *new_owner) {
> > @@ -1597,7 +1604,6 @@ pa_bluetooth_discovery* pa_bluetooth_discovery_get(pa_core *c) {
> >
> > endpoint_init(y, PA_BLUETOOTH_PROFILE_A2DP_SINK);
> > endpoint_init(y, PA_BLUETOOTH_PROFILE_A2DP_SOURCE);
> > - y->backend = pa_bluetooth_backend_new(c);
> >
> > get_managed_objects(y);
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.3
>
> I guess this one is fine to apply now that I covered your comments.
Yes, sorry for not applying it immediately. I somehow missed this patch,
even though it was marked as read in my mailbox.
Did you have a look on the "bluetooth: Move stuff to
pa_transport_put/unlink()" patch? Does it make sense to you?
--
Tanu
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list