[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Add a .travis.yml for Travis CI

[Felipe Sateler]

On 16 April 2015 at 06:23, Tanu Kaskinen <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 14:25 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> On 16 April 2015 at 14:23, Tanu Kaskinen <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 12:43 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> >> But some reasons for installing packages explicitly:
>> >>
>> >> 1. Not in build-dep (git-core, check)
>> >> 2. Version upgrade after adding the trusty repositories. The build
>> >> failed if I didn't upgrade the autotools before building (not sure
>> >> why).
>> >
>> > So "apt-get build-dep" doesn't automatically upgrade all dependencies if
>> > they're already installed? And you didn't want to do a full system
>> > upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04.
>> >
>> >> 3. Me being lazy. dh-autoreconf is not used but I know it brings in
>> >> all the required deps for running autotools (we use that in the debian
>> >> package).
>> >>
>> >> Some pruning may be possible, but perhaps it is better to scrap the
>> >> build-dep and be explicit on what is depended upon.
>> >
>> > Having an explicit list of the build dependencies seems like the best
>> > way forward.
>>
>> I'm not a huge fan of this since we'd have to remember to update the
>> file each time deps change. Using the Ubuntu packaging deps seems more
>> pragmatic.
>
> Well, "apt-get build-dep" is great in theory, but it sounds like it may
> result in some dependencies coming from 12.04 and some from 14.04,
> because already-installed packages don't get updated, and according to
> Felipe, that already caused problems with autotools. What do you think
> would be the best way to solve this?
>

I'd favor putting the whole list in the travis file. Advantages of doing so:

1. Tested documentation on required build dependencies.
2. Installing manually instead of build-dep makes apt upgrade the
dependencies in question. Given that the base environment is 3 years
old, we should be doing this anyway. Unfortunately, a dist-upgrade is
not the best option for this since the environment is not quite
pristine (I tried this and it failed).
3. No need to worry to keep in sync between what is in the ubuntu
package vs upstream. Ubuntu might have some options disabled due to
core/non-core distinctions (I believe that is why libweb-rtc is not
enabled in ubuntu) or simply because the ubuntu release is too old.

Also, we can just pick up the base from the ubuntu package so it is
not much extra work either.


-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler