[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] format: Make pa_format_info_valid() stricter for PCM
arun at accosted.net
arun at accosted.net
Wed Dec 30 20:12:56 PST 2015
From: Arun Raghavan <git at arunraghavan.net>
We should do stricter validation when we can.
---
src/pulse/format.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/pulse/format.c b/src/pulse/format.c
index c2a1552..b07940a 100644
--- a/src/pulse/format.c
+++ b/src/pulse/format.c
@@ -101,7 +101,13 @@ void pa_format_info_free(pa_format_info *f) {
}
int pa_format_info_valid(const pa_format_info *f) {
- return (f->encoding >= 0 && f->encoding < PA_ENCODING_MAX && f->plist != NULL);
+ pa_sample_spec ss;
+
+ if (pa_format_info_is_pcm(f)) {
+ pa_format_info_to_sample_spec(f, &ss, NULL);
+ return pa_sample_spec_valid(&ss);
+ } else
+ return (f->encoding >= 0 && f->encoding < PA_ENCODING_MAX && f->plist != NULL);
}
int pa_format_info_is_pcm(const pa_format_info *f) {
--
2.5.0
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list