[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v4] Make module loopback honor requested latency

Alexander E. Patrakov patrakov at gmail.com
Fri Feb 6 02:02:33 PST 2015


06.02.2015 14:56, Georg Chini wrote:
> One more thing: There is a systematic error in the adjust_time I could
> not work around without
> introducing too much overhead. The latency snapshot varies widely in the
> execution time, I
> measured values between 50 us and more than 60 ms. So if the extreme
> values follow each other
> you will have one adjust time that is around 60 ms too long and another
> one which is 60 ms too
> short. Maybe this also contributes significantly to the (in)stability of
> regulation.

Thanks for this observation. I will look into it, too.

-- 
Alexander E. Patrakov


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list