[pulseaudio-discuss] Two packaging questions

[Felipe Sateler]

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:56 PM, David Henningsson
<david.henningsson at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On 2015-01-31 08:19, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov
>> <patrakov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 31.01.2015 04:49, David Henningsson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2)
>>>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: couldn't find library libavahi-wrap.so needed
>>>> by
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> debian/pulseaudio-module-raop/usr/lib/pulse-6.0/modules/module-raop-discover.so
>>>> (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH:
>>>> '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pulseaudio:/usr/lib/pulse-6.0/modules')
>>>
>>>
>>>> The other one I'm not so sure about. Both libavahi-wrap.so and
>>>> module-raop-discover.so are shipped in the same Debian package
>>>> (pulseaudio-module-raop) so I'm not sure why it's complaining.
>>>
>>>
>>> Please verify the "Both libraries are shipped in the same Debian package"
>>> statement. At least for the previous version, they are not.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/pulseaudio-module-raop/filelist
>>
>> Indeed, it is shipped with the zeroconf module:
>>
>> % dlocate avahi-wrap.so
>> pulseaudio-module-zeroconf: /usr/lib/pulse-5.99.2/modules/libavahi-wrap.so
>>
>
> Must have confused RAOP with zeroconf somehow.  Then this is a packaging
> error I assume (raop needs to depend on zeroconf, or the other way around,
> or...). Thanks for looking it up!

It is not a bug in pulseaudio, it is just that dpkg-shlibdeps is not
smart enough:

% apt-cache show pulseaudio-module-raop | grep Depends
Depends: libavahi-client3 (>= 0.6.16), libavahi-common3 (>= 0.6.16),
libc6 (>= 2.4), libcap2 (>= 1:2.10), libpulse0 (= 5.99.2-2),
libssl1.0.0 (>= 1.0.0), pulseaudio (= 5.99.2-2),
pulseaudio-module-zeroconf

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler