[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2 2/6] card: don't allow the CARD_NEW hook to fail
Alexander E. Patrakov
patrakov at gmail.com
Sun Jun 12 13:19:45 UTC 2016
10.06.2016 22:55, Tanu Kaskinen пишет:
> There is currently no use for allowing modules to cancel card creation,
> and I don't see need for that in the future either. Let's simplify
> things by removing the failure handling code.
> ---
> src/pulsecore/card.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/pulsecore/card.c b/src/pulsecore/card.c
> index 410746b..0ac70b9 100644
> --- a/src/pulsecore/card.c
> +++ b/src/pulsecore/card.c
> @@ -149,12 +149,7 @@ pa_card *pa_card_new(pa_core *core, pa_card_new_data *data) {
> }
>
> pa_card_new_data_set_name(data, name);
> -
> - if (pa_hook_fire(&core->hooks[PA_CORE_HOOK_CARD_NEW], data) < 0) {
> - pa_xfree(c);
> - pa_namereg_unregister(core, name);
> - return NULL;
> - }
> + pa_hook_fire(&core->hooks[PA_CORE_HOOK_CARD_NEW], data);
No opinion here. Maybe the new code is OK, or maybe an assert should be
added so that it is explicit that the hook is not expected to fail.
>
> c->core = core;
> c->name = pa_xstrdup(data->name);
>
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list