[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2 2/6] card: don't allow the CARD_NEW hook to fail

Alexander E. Patrakov patrakov at gmail.com
Sun Jun 12 13:19:45 UTC 2016


10.06.2016 22:55, Tanu Kaskinen пишет:
> There is currently no use for allowing modules to cancel card creation,
> and I don't see need for that in the future either. Let's simplify
> things by removing the failure handling code.
> ---
>  src/pulsecore/card.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/pulsecore/card.c b/src/pulsecore/card.c
> index 410746b..0ac70b9 100644
> --- a/src/pulsecore/card.c
> +++ b/src/pulsecore/card.c
> @@ -149,12 +149,7 @@ pa_card *pa_card_new(pa_core *core, pa_card_new_data *data) {
>      }
>
>      pa_card_new_data_set_name(data, name);
> -
> -    if (pa_hook_fire(&core->hooks[PA_CORE_HOOK_CARD_NEW], data) < 0) {
> -        pa_xfree(c);
> -        pa_namereg_unregister(core, name);
> -        return NULL;
> -    }
> +    pa_hook_fire(&core->hooks[PA_CORE_HOOK_CARD_NEW], data);

No opinion here. Maybe the new code is OK, or maybe an assert should be 
added so that it is explicit that the hook is not expected to fail.

>
>      c->core = core;
>      c->name = pa_xstrdup(data->name);
>

-- 
Alexander E. Patrakov


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list