[pulseaudio-discuss] [alsa-devel] ASoC and pulseaudio

[Liam Girdwood]

On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 20:27 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

> Okay catching up on this thread now..
> 
> So I don't think FW name would help, if required we should add dev_info
> to print the firmware which is getting loaded.
> 
> Now, since we have topology we should comprehend that as well. The
> topology files essentially change the DSP graph and hence would required
> different UCM settings so that should be added to name too. Same
> hardware with different graph will need different settings..
> 
> And while thinking for it, I think it might be good to separate the SoC
> and codec settings and in UCM setting for card specify the combination.
> That may avoid duplicate codec setting all over the place for different
> combination. I don't know if UCM supports that...

That's the plan :)

The intention is to make UCM machine specific rather than driver
specific configuration. Han is going to add #include and #define like
support to UCM in order to facilitate a library of codec UCM files that
can be included into machine UCM configs.

Liam

> 
> Thanks