[pulseaudio-discuss] Revisiting raop2 patches

[Tanu Kaskinen]

On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 17:49 -0500, Hajime Fujita wrote:
> So now I have a new set of patches which (hopefully) address all of
> Anton's following comments.
> Now the patches are rebased against `next`, as some of the raop
> patches have already been merged here.
> 
> I think the standard practice is to rebase patches on top of master,
> but for this case can I simply push the patches on top of next?

Yes, basing the patches on "next" is probably the best choice.

-- 
Tanu

https://www.patreon.com/tanuk