[pulseaudio-discuss] avoid-resampling -> avoid-processing

Arun Raghavan arun at arunraghavan.net
Mon Oct 15 04:29:02 UTC 2018



On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, at 11:13 AM, Sangchul Lee wrote:
> 2018년 9월 27일 (목) 오후 12:30, Arun Raghavan <arun at arunraghavan.net>님이 작성:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, at 5:15 PM, Sangchul Lee wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > We could provide more fine-grained control (avoid-resampling/-
> > > > > remapping/-conversion/-channel-mix), but I don't see the benefit of
> > > > > this, so I figure a more overarching option is more likely to be
> > > > > useful.
> > > > >
> > > > > Would be nice to hear people's thoughts on this.
> > > >
> > > > Having an "avoid-processing" option is a good idea. I'm not sure what
> > > > your proposal is for the old "avoid-resampling" option in daemon.conf.
> > > > I'd like to keep that separate, so that it only affects sample rate
> > > > conversion.
> > >
> > > I understood the backward compatibility you said. Do I need to modify
> > > the patch expanding bit-depth("Consider sample format for
> > > avoid-resampling/passthrough") with the new 'avoid-processing' option?
> > > (I might upload a patch to the gitlab next time.)
> >
> > I've got a bunch of  changes waiting on top of hte existing passthrough test MR. You probably should work off that. I've got the changes at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/arun/pulseaudio/tree/reconfigure
> 
> I checked commits on your local branch including replacing the option
> name. It will be great to have the previous option with some logs for
> guide according to the "The next best alternative" of tanu's opinion.
> 
> And for now, I'll share V3 of "Consider sample format.." patch without
> changing the name via email soon.

I've implemented this feedback, some automated tests, and other review comments in:

  https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/merge_requests/24

Cheers,
Arun


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list