[pulseaudio-discuss] 100% volume limit bogus
sean at seangreenslade.com
Fri Feb 8 04:39:00 UTC 2019
On February 7, 2019 4:21:05 PM PST, liebrecht at grossmann-venter.com wrote:
>I found an interesting reason why this 100% Volume policy in
>is actually detrimental.
>The sound is very low with the pavucontrol 100% and my keyboard buttons
>cannot go past that as that is how pavu controls it.
>Its fair, but as soon as I start QEMU, (which uses pulseaudio as sound)
>with a windows virtual machine something peculiar happens.
>I p-lay music on the linux machine which has nothing to do with
>Once windows boots up in QEMU, sometimes with no config on my side,
>pushes the volume omn Linux up way past the maximum of pavucontrol to
>Why this QEMU raising of Linux host volume happens is a mystery to me.
>Please read this carefully and consider:
>It is better to have pulseaudio 100% at system absolutely maximum
>so that the user can set volume down.
>Since you implemented this 100% restriction that is way too low volume,
>other applications like QEMU seemingly finds a way to go to the real
>maximum which makes your low volume policy severely detrimental.
>This policy forces the user to set the hardware output device at almost
>maximum, w2hich creates a lot of trouvble if another application finds
>way around this silly limit and blasts your ears out, as Qemu and
>Qemu just willy nilly turns up the linux output volume to its correct
>maximum way way past the imho dangerous and deceptive pavu lower
>Give the user full control so they can set their own maximum limit.
>These non-working and bypassable synthetic limits creates more damage
>than they intend to prevent.
There is a setting to disable flat volumes, which is probably what you want. See the "flat-volumes" option:
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss