u_int32_t vs uint32_t

[Keith Packard]

Around 9 o'clock on Aug 23, Stuart Kreitman wrote:

> I have posted this question internally to see if we have a language 
> lawyer who can explain whether there's some
> standards body intent to push one form or another. Its not my bag.

I've always understood the types to be uint32_t et alia.

-keith


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://freedesktop.org/pipermail/release-wranglers/attachments/20040823/498fe113/attachment.pgp