X11R6.8.2 maintenance release plans and call for comments.

[Adam Jackson]

On Tuesday 26 October 2004 20:20, Ian Romanick wrote:
> What should be done about things like the endianess issues in the
> t_vertex code in the r128 and r200 drivers?  I committed fixes to Mesa
> CVS (trunk).  I'd really like to see those fixes committed.  Without
> them, those drivers really suck on big-endian systems. :)  I suspect
> that radeon driver has the same problems, but I don't have any PowerPC
> R100 cards to test.
>
> If none of these bugs had fixes already in CVS, I'd suggests that a bug
> be filed for all of them (i.e., "Big-endian problems with t_vertex
> drivers") and that depend on a bug for each of the individual drivers.
> Is that still the right answer?

For Mesa (anything in extras/ really) I think we're justified in just saying 
"Bug #XXX: Import current Mesa stable branch for 6.8.2" and then documenting 
the changes from the commit messages for the stable branch.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://freedesktop.org/pipermail/release-wranglers/attachments/20041026/021b5c01/attachment-0001.pgp