Bootstrapping X.Org (was Call Monday 24 Jan 2005)

[Daniel Stone]

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 09:59:44PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >Would the top-level Makefile thing, or jhbuild, satisfy your concern here?
> 
> Using jhbuild does not satisfy my concerns which are to make sure that 
> the X.Org tree can be distibuted under a MIT/BSD-style license, and that 
> X can be built and distibuted as part of the base installation of OpenBSD.
> 
> Jhbuild is depending on python, which is not part of the base OpenBSD 
> system and has a license that can become a problem for people who want 
> to binaries.

My understanding of the *BSD ports was that you guys had Makefiles
which controlled the building of each specific module, so surely you
could use those, no?  I was suggesting jhbuild as a convenience for
end users.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/release-wranglers/attachments/20050130/1e48df97/attachment.pgp