[SCIM] Re: [immodule-qt] how about built-in dead key support?

[LiuCougar]

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:41:59 +0800, Zhe Su <james.su at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. build dead/multi key support into scim is a good idea. I'm also
> thinking about it. However it's impossible to implement it with a
> table file of generic table IMEngine.
What's the problem then? Can we improve the generic table IMEngine?
 
> And I'm thinking if it's better to implement this feature as a proxy
> IMEngine in future scim release. Though, it's resonable to write a
> special IMEngine for this purpose right now.
I agree ;)

> But in the other side, implementing this feature in qt is necessary,
> because there is not only scim-qtimm. uim-qtimm and iiimqcf etc. are
> all need this feature.
Definitely.

-- 
"People's characters are strengthened through struggle against
difficulties; they are weakened by comfort."
- Old Chinese adage