[SCIM] skim and Fedora Core 2

[Jan Hefti]

LiuCougar wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:14:07 +0200, Jan Hefti <j.hefti at hamburg.de> wrote:
>  
>
>>No, that is not normal. It sounds as if you are using a Chinese font
>>instead of a font (or a collection of fonts - have a look at
>>http://www.suse.de/~mfabian/suse-cjk/kde-font-setup.html ) capable of
>>displaying a larger range of Unicode characters. Apart from changing
>>your font, another way to solve your problem is to change
>>
>>alias CN='LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 XMODIFIERS="@im=SCIM"'
>>
>>to
>>
>>alias CN='LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 XMODIFIERS="@im=SCIM"'
>>
>>You can also have a look at "Dialog: SCIM Globale Einstellungen" in the
>>online help of skim or my howto for a way to use skim without changing
>>your locale.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Roland
>>>
>>>PS: The rpm can be found at
>>>http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~p1woro/rpms/skim-1.0.0-1.i386.rpm
>>>It is signed with my gpg key 0x9ec54794a0091bf2 (I use this key only together
>>>with my private Mail or to sign the two or three packages I make).
>>>If you want I can construct an unsigned package.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Great! Thanks a lot for your work!
>>
>>Cougar, I think it would be good if we could include the rpm in our
>>Fedora Core 2 Build downloads section, don't you?
>>    
>>
>Thanks for your work. I think so too.
>
>I just wonder whether an unsigned rpm is better than a signed one?
>what's your opinion?
>  
>
Technically, I think either would be fine, but maybe people would ask 
about the public key, so to keep things consistent (either leave all 
rpms unsigned or have them signed with the same key), an unsigned rpm 
could be the better option.

>BTW: did you use the attached spec file? Did you modify it in some way?
>
>Thanks,
>Regards,
>Cougar
>  
>
Regards,
Jan