<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - RFE: disable effects on the fly if bandwidth gets low or if latency gets high"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43757#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - RFE: disable effects on the fly if bandwidth gets low or if latency gets high"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43757">bug 43757</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:bugzilla@victortoso.com" title="Victor Toso <bugzilla@victortoso.com>"> <span class="fn">Victor Toso</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=43757#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Victor Toso from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=43757#c2">comment #2</a>)
> > Well, changing options dynamically to make usage better with lower bandwith
> > seems a good RFE. Maybe we should open a new RFE for it?
>
> in theory, we already have some adaptative compression (changing compression
> method, and doing local rendering to send bigger updates), so it's not clear
> what else we would do. Opening a bug to say "improve bandwidth" is quite
> worthless.</span >
I wanted to mean a way to improve user experience over lower bandwidth like we
do about choosing the compression (I'm not really sure we change the
compression after it is chosen; if that is the case, it could be improved as
the bandwidth can change);</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>