<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Include spice-webdavd" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94215#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Include spice-webdavd" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94215">bug 94215</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:bugzilla@victortoso.com" title="Victor Toso <bugzilla@victortoso.com>"> Victor Toso</a> <pre>(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94215#c2">comment #2</a>) > (In reply to Victor Toso from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94215#c1">comment #1</a>) > > Maybe we should change this to RFE and include spice-webdavd logic as a new > > daemon in agent? > > If there is any benefit. 1-) I don't think anyone would be using spice-webdavd without having the spice-vdagent. 2-) Spice-vdagent package is already on live images. We could have spice-webdav by just increasing the requirement to have phodav 3-) We will get that on spice-guest-tools for free as well, kinda. > > I think webdavd could really use agent messages to be aware when user is > > connected/disconnected. > > Why wouldn't spice-webdavd be able to know just like the agent when user is > connected/disconnected? (based on virtio channel events) Well, I bet it can but we already have spice-vdagentd to read and parse the messages. I think it makes sense to port this there. Agree?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>