[Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/9] build: require c99

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Wed Apr 27 05:03:29 PDT 2011


On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:22:34AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Why do you want to require c99? Do the compilers we use on windows
> > have
> > good enough c99 support?
> 
> Because we use c99: stdbool.h, inttypes.h, bool, variadic macros, // comments, ...
> 
> Actually, I wonder if 43c5b4f97334f0f4ca61bdd679b68d079575deac is redundant if we use that patch.

Your patch looks better though if autoconf has dedicated macros to switch
to c99

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20110427/f04b6138/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list