[Spice-devel] windows bsod with spice 0.8.1

[Emre Erenoglu]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Alon Levy <alevy at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:00:28PM +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
> > <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Alon Levy <alevy at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> hello,
> > > >> I could send my self compiled qxldd.dll and qxl.sys as described in
> > > >> thread for w2k3 32bit:
> > > >>
> > >
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2011-April/003168.html
> > > >>
> > > >> but I don't know if there are copyright restrictions or other
> > > >> limitations in doing so...
> > > >
> > > > Seems to depend on the "Microsoft Software License Terms for the WDK"
> > > according
> > > > to http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/win32/qxl/tree/display/brush.c
> > > >
> > > > Better go read that at some point..
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Gianluca
> > >
> > > Inside the winddk I've used I can find the files attached in the
> attached
> > > zip:
> > > license.rtf
> > > relnote.htm
> > >
> > > But reading them I'm not able to understand which sort of
> > > distributable condition applies for the generated files qxldd.dll and
> > > qxl.sys....
> > >
> >
> > I don't understand how we can get stuck in the license issue, since these
> > drivers are already posted in the internet on the spice-space.org.
> What's
> > the difference?
> >
> > I think I will need to build it myself.
>
> There are already binaries available all over the place - in
> spice-space.org/download.
> I think they are not checked (i.e. with debug symbols), but still should be
> fine.
>
>
Yes, but I need the checked ones with debug symbols if we will debug the
driver.

-- 
Emre
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20110427/45e7c3ac/attachment.htm>