[Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/3] RfC: fix locking
Alon Levy
alevy at redhat.com
Thu Apr 28 04:39:21 PDT 2011
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:26:38PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 04/28/11 13:14, Alon Levy wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:13:07PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >>Here is a alternative approach to fix the qemu locking issue. It simply
> >>handles the updates in the display refresh timer instead of switching
> >>back and forth between the threads using the pipe.
> >>
> >>comments?
> >
> >Looks good. I guess you are sure that the lock is less resource hungry then
> >switching threads? Anyhow it's way less code, which is great.
>
> Yes, the main point of doing it this way is to avoid thread context
> switches.
>
> Beside that even the pipe version needs a lock for the update
> pointer variable (which is accessed in non-atomic ways from both
> iothread and spice-server thread context), i.e. it is buggy as-is.
> The race window is pretty small and probably hard to hit though,
> guess thats why no issues showed up so far in practice.
I don't think it was, even without locking, but that's moot with your better
solution.
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list