[Spice-devel] [PATCH 22/24] server/red_channel: don't set blocked when ack window full
Alon Levy
alevy at redhat.com
Wed Feb 2 13:30:42 PST 2011
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:53:22PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Isn't this undoing what was done in patch 19??
>
It is. Good catch. But the problem the comment in patch 19 reports
does need to be addressed, that is setting the blocked flag if ack
window breached. I'll make a new patch instead of 19 and 22.
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Alon Levy <alevy at redhat.com> wrote:
> > blocked is set only on output block.
> > ---
> > server/red_channel.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/server/red_channel.c b/server/red_channel.c
> > index 9ad2e5a..0eba73c 100644
> > --- a/server/red_channel.c
> > +++ b/server/red_channel.c
> > @@ -574,18 +574,20 @@ void red_channel_pipe_add_type(RedChannel *channel, int pipe_item_type)
> > red_channel_push(channel);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int red_channel_waiting_for_ack(RedChannel *channel)
> > +{
> > + return (channel->handle_acks && (channel->ack_data.messages_window > channel->ack_data.client_window * 2));
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline PipeItem *red_channel_pipe_get(RedChannel *channel)
> > {
> > PipeItem *item;
> >
> > if (!channel || channel->send_data.blocked ||
> > + red_channel_waiting_for_ack(channel) ||
> > !(item = (PipeItem *)ring_get_tail(&channel->pipe))) {
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > - if (channel->handle_acks && (channel->ack_data.messages_window > channel->ack_data.client_window * 2)) {
> > - channel->send_data.blocked = TRUE;
> > - return NULL;
> > - }
> > --channel->pipe_size;
> > ring_remove(&item->link);
> > return item;
> > --
> > 1.7.3.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spice-devel mailing list
> > Spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Marc-André Lureau
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list