[Spice-devel] [RFCv5 03/47] server/red_worker: drop red_pipe_add_tail, use red_channel_pipe_add_tail

[Alon Levy]

The only difference between them being that the later also does a push.
I don't believe that to be a problem, but if it does I can always introduce
a push'less version.
---
 server/red_client_cache.h |    2 +-
 server/red_worker.c       |    9 +--------
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/server/red_client_cache.h b/server/red_client_cache.h
index a79944a..fae4b2a 100644
--- a/server/red_client_cache.h
+++ b/server/red_client_cache.h
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void FUNC_NAME(remove)(CHANNEL *channel, CacheItem *item)
     channel->VAR_NAME(available) += item->size;
 
     red_channel_pipe_item_init(&channel->common.base, &item->u.pipe_data, PIPE_ITEM_TYPE_INVAL_ONE);
-    red_pipe_add_tail(&channel->common.base, &item->u.pipe_data); // for now
+    red_channel_pipe_add_tail(&channel->common.base, &item->u.pipe_data); // for now
 }
 
 static int FUNC_NAME(add)(CHANNEL *channel, uint64_t id, size_t size)
diff --git a/server/red_worker.c b/server/red_worker.c
index 0148e40..7432ffb 100644
--- a/server/red_worker.c
+++ b/server/red_worker.c
@@ -1135,13 +1135,6 @@ static inline void pipe_item_remove(PipeItem *item)
     ring_remove(&item->link);
 }
 
-static inline void red_pipe_add_tail(RedChannel *channel, PipeItem *item)
-{
-    ASSERT(channel);
-    channel->pipe_size++;
-    ring_add_before(&item->link, &channel->pipe);
-}
-
 static void red_pipe_add_verb(RedChannel* channel, uint16_t verb)
 {
     VerbItem *item = spice_new(VerbItem, 1);
@@ -1198,7 +1191,7 @@ static inline void red_pipe_add_drawable_to_tail(RedWorker *worker, Drawable *dr
         return;
     }
     drawable->refs++;
-    red_pipe_add_tail(&worker->display_channel->common.base, &drawable->pipe_item);
+    red_channel_pipe_add_tail(&worker->display_channel->common.base, &drawable->pipe_item);
 }
 
 static inline void red_pipe_add_drawable_after(RedWorker *worker, Drawable *drawable,
-- 
1.7.5.1