[Spice-devel] Announcing spice 0.9.1 & spice-protocol 0.9.0
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Fri Sep 2 08:12:21 PDT 2011
Hi,
On 09/02/2011 03:41 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 13:49 +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 01:30:41PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:52 +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:59:14AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:44:58PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>>> * Multi-client support, disabled by default (experimental!) set the
>>>>>> environment variable SPICE_DEBUG_ALLOW_MC before starting qemu to enable
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we have documentation explaining what multiclient is, and how to use it?
>>>>> I think there's a page on the wiki, but I'm not 100% sure about this :-/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Updated http://spice-space.org/page/Features/MultipleClients
>>> <snip>
>>> Thank you for implementing this feature. Are there any plans to add
>>> multi-user or multi-tenant (trying to find some new label) where each
>>> connection has their own channels, that is they have their own desktop
>>> rather than sharing the same desktop? - John
>>>
>>
>> You mean you want to have a single vm with a single spice server, but two clients,
>> one talking to windows session A and another to windows session B, or in linux
>> case one talking to X server A and another to X server B?
>>
>> I'd say that requires quite a lot of changes:
>> For windows: update driver to work with terminal services? no idea really how to
>> implement this in windows, but definitely a driver issue. Currently there is just
>> a single working PDev in windows.
>>
>> For linux: probably easier. Would have to have different X servers, so actually easier
>> then having multiple cards for a single X server. But otoh how do you add devices on the
>> fly? not sure linux would handle this right. Never tried.
>>
>> So in summary I don't have any plans for this, and it doesn't seem to be too easy either.
>>
>> Alon
>>
> Yes, that is it exactly. Alas :(
>
Don't we have the Linux case covered for like 99% with Xspice? All that is required
is for the VM and the guests to have some way to do a socket connection between the
2 (iow they cannot be on completely isolated networks).
You don't even need to do it in a VM then.
As for the windows case, I agree we don't have a solution for that and won't likely
have it in the future either. The windows case sounds to me like you just want windows
terminal server. You likely would need a license for that anyways even if you were to
use spice as the display protocol, because of how windows licensing works.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list