[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice] server: Don't complain if setsockopt NODELAY fails on unix sockets
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Wed Jan 18 01:57:16 PST 2012
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:50:08AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> With Daniel P. Berrange's patches to allow use of pre-supplied fd's
> as channels, we can no longer be sure that our connections are TCP
> sockets, so it makes no sense to complain if a TCP/IP specific
> setsockopt fails with an errno of ENOTSUP.
>
> Note that this extends Daniel's commit 492ddb5d1d595e2d12208f4602b18e4432f4e6b4
> which already added the same check to server/inputs_channel.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
> ---
> server/red_tunnel_worker.c | 4 +++-
> server/red_worker.c | 4 +++-
> server/reds.c | 4 +++-
> server/snd_worker.c | 8 ++++++--
> server/spicevmc.c | 6 ++++--
> 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
ACK, sorry I missed those instances of setsockopt().
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list