[Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Release 0.11.0

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Thu Jun 14 03:01:53 PDT 2012


Hey,

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:01:54PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
> But I thought it doesn't break existing users. If it does that's not
> what I meant. I thought the important name was that before the .so, i.e.
> libspice-server, and that the dynamic linker will look for .1 and then
> if none found will use anything newer.

Nope, it will look for an exact match for libspice-server.so.N, so
if a binary was built against libspice-server.so.1, the binary won't run
with anything different. If a library is ABI compatible with an older
version but has newer interfaces, the soname must not change for older
binaries to keep using it.

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20120614/e81994a2/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list