[Spice-devel] spice-xpi

[Lubos Kocman]

Hello Marc-Andre,

I agree as well that parsing logs is not the best way. I had easy way to probe old spice-client trough systemtap. But since the new client uses gobjects I'm no more able to trace what I need. It could be possible if we could inject some stap probes inside code.

The whole thing that rhevm does for us is to execute client and pass some values to it. If you have a better working way to get these values then feel free to share it.


Lubos

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc-André Lureau" <mlureau at redhat.com>
To: "Peter Hatina" <phatina at redhat.com>
Cc: spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 1:55:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] spice-xpi



----- Mensaje original -----
> Hi,
> 
> as Marc-Andre has decided to drop log4cpp, I would like to at least
> revert the part of the message format. The reason is simple, Spice-QA
> guys are developing a test framework, which uses the log4cpp format
> we had.
> 
> Opinions?

IOW, why not just implementing a glog handler with the "expected format"?

Tbh, I am not convinced that parsing logging output is a good way to test a functionality, as it tends to break very easily...

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel