[Spice-devel] spice-xpi

[Peter Hatina]

On 03/13/2012 01:55 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Mensaje original -----
>> Hi,
>>
>> as Marc-Andre has decided to drop log4cpp, I would like to at least
>> revert the part of the message format. The reason is simple, Spice-QA
>> guys are developing a test framework, which uses the log4cpp format
>> we had.
>>
>> Opinions?
> 
> IOW, why not just implementing a glog handler with the "expected format"?
> 
> Tbh, I am not convinced that parsing logging output is a good way to test a functionality, as it tends to break very easily...
> 

Why not? Simply, in custom handler I can not get __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ to
the caller. It's substituted by the handler function name.

-- 
Peter Hatina
EMEA ENG-Desktop Development
Red Hat Czech, Brno