[Spice-devel] spice-xpi

Peter Hatina phatina at redhat.com
Tue Mar 13 06:26:14 PDT 2012

On 03/13/2012 01:55 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> ----- Mensaje original -----
>> Hi,
>> as Marc-Andre has decided to drop log4cpp, I would like to at least
>> revert the part of the message format. The reason is simple, Spice-QA
>> guys are developing a test framework, which uses the log4cpp format
>> we had.
>> Opinions?
> IOW, why not just implementing a glog handler with the "expected format"?
> Tbh, I am not convinced that parsing logging output is a good way to test a functionality, as it tends to break very easily...

Why not? Simply, in custom handler I can not get __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ to
the caller. It's substituted by the handler function name.

Peter Hatina
EMEA ENG-Desktop Development
Red Hat Czech, Brno

More information about the Spice-devel mailing list