[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice] Translate docbook -> asciidoc

[Jonathon Jongsma]

for what it's worth, I think asciidoc looks a bit easier to maintain, so I'm in favor of using it.  I don't really have an opinion on the other issues.



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christophe Fergeau" <cfergeau at redhat.com>
> To: "Marc-André Lureau" <mlureau at redhat.com>
> Cc: spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:32:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice] Translate docbook -> asciidoc
> 
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:06:51AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Hey,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 02:07:39PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > > It's much much easier to read and edit
> > > 
> > > Hmm, this changes things to one big txt file and one big html file.
> > > The one source file per section approach plus one html file per
> > > section versions were imo easier to handle, is it possible to have that
> > > with asciidoc as well?
> > 
> > Oh, I much prefer a single document, since it's easier to browse.
> > 
> > But you should be able to generate multi-page document with docbook
> > toolchain. But then, I would quite strongly discourage this. What's the
> > problem with single page?
> 
> Dunno, I'm more comfortable with smaller pages rather than single big one,
> matter of personal preference I guess. The link you gave seems to imply
> it's possible to generate both anyway ?
> 
> Christophe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
>