[Spice-devel] [PATCH 17/18] display: factor out draw_until
Fabiano Fidêncio
fidencio at redhat.com
Mon Nov 23 11:05:12 PST 2015
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau at gmail.com>
>
> ---
> server/display-channel.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/server/display-channel.c b/server/display-channel.c
> index c5a69e3..a78f86a 100644
> --- a/server/display-channel.c
> +++ b/server/display-channel.c
> @@ -1281,6 +1281,24 @@ static void surface_update_dest(RedSurface *surface, const SpiceRect *area)
> canvas->ops->read_bits(canvas, dest, -stride, area);
> }
>
> +static void draw_until(DisplayChannel *display, RedSurface *surface, Drawable *last)
> +{
> + RingItem *ring_item;
> + Container *container;
> + Drawable *now;
> +
> + do {
> + ring_item = ring_get_tail(&surface->current_list);
> + now = SPICE_CONTAINEROF(ring_item, Drawable, surface_list_link);
> + now->refs++;
> + container = now->tree_item.base.container;
> + current_remove_drawable(display, now);
> + container_cleanup(container);
> + drawable_draw(display, now);
> + display_channel_drawable_unref(display, now);
> + } while (now != last);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Renders drawables for updating the requested area, but only drawables that are older
> * than 'last' (exclusive).
> @@ -1340,27 +1358,18 @@ void display_channel_draw_till(DisplayChannel *display, const SpiceRect *area, i
>
> region_destroy(&rgn);
>
> - if (!surface_last) {
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - do {
> - Container *container;
> + /* drawable_draw may call display_channel_draw for the surfaces
> + * 'now' depends on. Notice, that it is valid to call
> + * display_channel_draw in this case and not
> + * display_channel_draw_till: It is impossible that there was
> + * newer item then 'last' in one of the surfaces that
> + * display_channel_draw is called for, Otherwise, 'now' would have
> + * already been rendered. See the call for
> + * red_handle_depends_on_target_surface in red_process_draw
> + */
> + if (surface_last)
> + draw_until(display, surface, surface_last);
>
> - ring_item = ring_get_tail(&surface->current_list);
> - now = SPICE_CONTAINEROF(ring_item, Drawable, surface_list_link);
> - now->refs++;
> - container = now->tree_item.base.container;
> - current_remove_drawable(display, now);
> - container_cleanup(container);
> - /* drawable_draw may call display_channel_draw for the surfaces 'now' depends on. Notice,
> - that it is valid to call display_channel_draw in this case and not display_channel_draw_till:
> - It is impossible that there was newer item then 'last' in one of the surfaces
> - that display_channel_draw is called for, Otherwise, 'now' would have already been rendered.
> - See the call for red_handle_depends_on_target_surface in red_process_draw */
> - drawable_draw(display, now);
> - display_channel_drawable_unref(display, now);
> - } while (now != surface_last);
> surface_update_dest(surface, area);
> }
>
> @@ -1370,8 +1379,7 @@ void display_channel_draw(DisplayChannel *display, const SpiceRect *area, int su
> Ring *ring;
> RingItem *ring_item;
> QRegion rgn;
> - Drawable *last;
> - Drawable *now;
> + Drawable *last, *now;
> spice_debug("surface %d: area ==>", surface_id);
> rect_debug(area);
>
> @@ -1397,22 +1405,8 @@ void display_channel_draw(DisplayChannel *display, const SpiceRect *area, int su
> }
> region_destroy(&rgn);
>
> - if (!last) {
> - surface_update_dest(surface, area);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - do {
> - Container *container;
> + if (last)
> + draw_until(display, surface, last);
>
> - ring_item = ring_get_tail(&surface->current_list);
> - now = SPICE_CONTAINEROF(ring_item, Drawable, surface_list_link);
> - now->refs++;
> - container = now->tree_item.base.container;
> - current_remove_drawable(display, now);
> - container_cleanup(container);
> - drawable_draw(display, now);
> - display_channel_drawable_unref(display, now);
> - } while (now != last);
> surface_update_dest(surface, area);
> }
> --
> 2.4.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
Looks good.
Acked-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio at redhat.com>
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list