[Spice-devel] [PATCH 11/18] worker: use spice_return_if_fail() instead of spice_assert() in release_item

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Tue Nov 24 04:18:33 PST 2015


On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:19:18AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > If g_return_if_fail() is deemed good-enough here, why not use it now and
> > have one less spice_return_if_fail() to come back to and change?
> 
> In the logging thread (actually the two thread) many people (like djasha and 
> Francois) didn't agreed on using two API for logging for different reasons
> and I personally agree with them.

I believe
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2015-November/024205.html
provides one possible solution to this concern.

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20151124/d4655b00/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list