[Spice-devel] [PATCH] tests: add explanation for test_qxl_pasring_SOURCES

Frediano Ziglio fziglio at redhat.com
Wed Feb 3 12:14:26 CET 2016


> 
> Hi
> 
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> <marcandre.lureau at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Instead of using libserver.a to include necessary functions we include
> >> single files to check for dependencies.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  server/tests/Makefile.am | 2 ++
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/server/tests/Makefile.am b/server/tests/Makefile.am
> >> index 8caff04..892a60b 100644
> >> --- a/server/tests/Makefile.am
> >> +++ b/server/tests/Makefile.am
> >> @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ libstat_test3_a_CPPFLAGS = $(AM_CPPFLAGS)
> >> -DTEST_COMPRESS_STAT=1 -DTEST_RED_WORK
> >>  libstat_test4_a_SOURCES = stat-test.c
> >>  libstat_test4_a_CPPFLAGS = $(AM_CPPFLAGS) -DTEST_COMPRESS_STAT=1
> >>  -DTEST_RED_WORKER_STAT=1 -DTEST_NAME=stat_test4
> >>
> >> +# Here we include only needed files to make sure code does not depend
> >> +# on extra files.
> >>  test_qxl_parsing_SOURCES =           \
> >
> > What's the point of doing that?
> >
> > anyway, if it matters for some reason, I'll drop my cleanup patch.
> 
> You didn't pick my patch, any reason for having those files seperate
> from the rest of the server? Imho it's not useful and not very
> future-proof either.
> 

Looks like not many people are worried about design, software layers
and dependencies.
When I wrote this part of the Makefile with the intention of making
sure parsing messages was a separate layer in the code.
Not writing nothing about was a mistake.
If nobody care I can remove the command and apply your patch.

Frediano


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list